How Can We Be Happy Often We Find That Our Unhappiness

How can we be happy? Often we find that our unhappiness is the child of some others doing. Someone slighted in someway, or our failures are the direct result of another s actions. It seems as though every negative result in our life was at the hands of others. How can we possibly be happy when so many people cause us pain? Existentialism suggests that the true root of our sadness is not others doing but our own. Existentialism asks us to take control of our own life and understand that all of our action are truly our own. In essence, by taking control of our lives we are the ultimate deciders of our own destiny, and we can not help but be satisfied with the outcomes of our decisions because we are the ones who made them.†¦show more content†¦Once man comes to life, he has only his lifespan to decide his own meaning. So what is one’s life, if there is no meaning. How would one characterize the human life? To an existentialist a life is only the actions a man tak es, â€Å"a man is nothing but what he makes of himself† (Pojman, Vaughn 595). The essence of a man is simply their life. While that may seem obvious the implication is that we are defined by what we do, not what we believe or what we think we are a part of. In the words of Inez, â€Å"You are—your life, and nothing else† (Sartre 25). The responsibility to find our own meaning is a large one. Because we are only our lives, and there is nothing after, how can we make the best of this short period we have? Simply we must find what out what we want our lives to mean to us, and pursue that to the best of our ability. Finding your meaning requires you understand your true self. Who you really are, how you see yourself. What Sartre describes as â€Å"the gaze† is the theory that humans often see themselves how others see them. And thus one s self image is in fact the how the many see the one, and not how the one sees himself. The gaze makes you a slave to to others. One may feel a lack of freedom to do as they please out of fear that others may judge them. It’s painful. In No Exit, Estelle is tortured by the lack of mirrors in the room. She can only see herself through the literal and figurative eyes of Inez and Garcin.Show MoreRelatedHappiness Is The Most Common Misconception Of Happiness907 Words   |  4 Pagesdoes not want to be happy. We live every single day in hope to find happiness, which also known as pursuit of happiness. We strive to bring happiness in our life. Nonetheless, along the journey to find happiness, some people stumble and find themselves unhappy instea d. One might question why, but actually we all have different value and understanding to describe happiness. Therefore, we have our own unique approach to pursue happiness and there is no telling to the exact cause of our wrongs and errorsRead MoreInternational Differences Of Well Being1005 Words   |  5 Pagesthat I think is very important. We all have a wide range of different priorities and values. First, he chooses to define happiness: I use the word ‘happiness for a subjective state of mind, which I define as the overall appreciation of one s life-as-a-whole. Happiness is the ‘sum of pleasures and pains . Happiness in this sense is synonymous with ‘life satisfaction and ‘subjective well-being (Veenhoven 329). Veenhoven, then, breaks up the questions How universal is happiness into sub-questionsRead MoreSocrates, Plato, and Aristotels View on Happiness1529 Words   |  7 PagesWhat Is Happiness What is happiness, and how can one achieve true happiness? This is the ultimate question of life and what every person is seeking an answer to. Many feel that they have found their answer in belonging to the faith of their choice, but what is it that their faith teaches them that brings them happiness? The Philosophers Socrates, Plato and Aristotle all have a similar view on what happiness is and how to achieve it. Aristotles view is based on Platos and Platos is based on SocratesRead MoreSigmund Freud : Civilization And Its Discontents1682 Words   |  7 Pageswrites about how civilization is a place of conflict when it comes to the need for conformity. Civilization is a place that does not function orderly despite having laws and regulations put in place. People often face the challenge in conforming to the restrictions in their daily lives when it comes to satisfying their needs. Sigmund Freud refers to religion as a method of conformity when people are conditioned to their belie fs. Men in a civilization have the objective to be happy, but often face unhappinessRead More13 Conversations924 Words   |  4 Pagesof Happiness ​Ask yourself if you’re really happy and you might be surprised at what you find. Ask several people at various points in their lives and you will get a different answer. This is the premise behind the film â€Å"13 Conversations about One Thing†, a touching, poignant and in some moments, deeply philosophical film, directed by Jill Sprecher. The film interweaves five contemporary stories into a single narrative. It deals with the profound, often unintentional impact that people have on oneRead MoreThe Ethical Theory Of Utilitarianism1543 Words   |  7 Pageselse really matters except the happiness of creatures that can be happy. This is the distinction between acts that attempt to maximize the good (utility) and acts that seek to minimize harm. Rachels describes utilitarian theory as being based on social reform in human behavior of which offers an alternative to natural laws. Utilitarians emphasize the deep connection between doing the right thing and causing happiness to make creatures happy. Some believe to do the right thing, because it’s the rightRead More August Strindbergs A Dream Play Essay1374 Words   |  6 Pagesfrom â€Å"the second world [and into] the third† (147, 17) by accident, but enters with optimism and faith in finding happiness in the human world. As she ventures further and further into the realm of human experience, not only does she not find happiness, but she finds that the tenacious desperation of humans is contagious, and that they have brought her to their own level of misery. Her only available course of action is to rid herself of their gloom and return to the heavens, but Strindberg weavesRead MoreFreedom Is The Best Thing For All Of Mankind1507 Words   |  7 Pagesare truly happy. For generations, people across the globe have even started wars to defend the right to freedom for all people and tear down all those who dare oppose its glorious ideals. But is freedom all that it has been to uted to be? In the story of Frederick Douglass and the Panopticon, increases in freedom cause problems. It seems like these texts both paint a similar picture. Freedom causes unhappiness in a group setting because groups broaden awareness and freedom is relative to our knowledgeRead MoreCharacter Analysis Of Uncle Vanya875 Words   |  4 Pagespublished in 1898. The protagonist, Ivan Petrovich Voynitskya, or Uncle Vanya, is a 47-year-old man who deals with constant boredom and dissatisfaction with his life. He often complains about his situation and goes on stubborn rants about the people around him, over-dramatically insulting their flaws. He tries to blame his unhappiness on those around him and doesn’t do much to change his situation. Instead, he constantly weights himself down with his own regrets and boredom with life. Vanya loves hisRead MoreEssay about Lets Fake Love1025 Words   |  5 PagesEmotions of love are of course a very natural and important part of life. Bu t it is the ideas of what love is and should be that vary in large degrees. These ideas, which begin shaping us from a very young age, are crucial to how we approach future intimate relationships. How were your images of love and romance were formed? When love is modeled in an unhealthy, impractical way it is misguided and will result in unrealistic expectations and ultimately unhappy relationships. As a direct result of

Book Review First To Fight by Victor H. Krulak - 644 Words

Book Review: First To Fight by Victor H. Krulak The United States Marine Corps is a frequently misunderstood, occasionally maligned but more frequently mythologized division of the U.S. Armed Forces. Sometimes its role is perceived as overlapping the roles and responsibilities of its military counterparts such as the U.S. Army, the U.S. Navy and the U.S. Air Force. However, as the exhaustive text by Victor Krulak shows, it is far more often seen as enhancing, focusing and insuring the roles and responsibilities. As the original pressing of Krulaks text was completed in 1984, a great many of the sentiments that permeate First in Fight: An Inside View of the U.S. Marine Corps carry pointedly Cold War-related messages and imperatives. However, an open-minded consideration of the text demonstrates a particular relevance for the servicemen and women of todays U.S. Marine Corps. Krulaks telling of the Corps history is among the sections which retains its relevance. At all points, Krulaks h istorical reporting is clear, straightforward and in the cases of World War II, Korea and Vietnam, strengthened by the authors firsthand and experience-driven accounts. Certainly, Krulaks experience is among the texts most important virtues. Indeed, this also informs the sense of protectiveness and resentment that sometimes emerges in the text as a product of what Krulak characterizes as a sort of relegation and isolation within the broader American defense scheme. In a sequence

The New Deal And Civil Rights - 899 Words

Over the years State powers has changed. The States have gained less power relative to the Federal government. Originally the States were the sole governing power through the Articles of the Confederation due to the fear of the development of a monarchy that the U.S. had fought so hard to rid themselves of. Thus gave creation a new form of government through the constitution which fundamentally began the shift of power from state to federal. Next, though significant historical events such as the New Deal and Civil Rights we will see the Federal government infringement on State power. Lastly, we will see how this constant struggle has continued to present day. First, let’s discuss how the constitution transferred State power to Federal power. The first form of U.S. Government was through the Articles of Confederation. The Articles joined the States into a collective group but allowed the states to retain their freedom and power (Lenz and Holman, 2013, p. 31). Unfortunately, soo n after the articles establishment the republic realized the need for a stronger federal government. Thus the constitution was signed and ratified establishing a stronger federal government to remedy the major defects of the Articles; taxing, executive office, interstate and foreign commerce, amendment, and domestic order (Lenz and Holman, 2013, p. 32). Therefore, the first drastic power shift occurred between State Power and Federal Power. According to Lenz and Holman (2013), the constitution providedShow MoreRelatedThe New Deal and the Civil Rights Legislation of the 1960s842 Words   |  3 Pages The New Deal of the 1930s and the civil rights legislation and movements of the 1960s were very different in what they did, but shared a common goal of bettering the country when they were introduced, and making the country better in the future. The New Deal of the 1930s and its programs were able to help millions of Americans get their feet back on the ground after the Great Depr ession. Civil rights legislation of the 1960s helped African-Americans get the respect and equality they deservedRead MoreFranklin D Roosevelt And The New Deal Program For Economic Relief, Recovery And Reform1193 Words   |  5 Pagesthe solidly democratic region to a solidly republican region. In the 1930’s Franklin D Roosevelt created the New Deal program for economic relief, recovery and reform. It expanded the role of the federal government to provide economic assistance for all (class notes). White southerners did not like this. They did not want the government’s hands in their finances and they felt the New Deal did just that (Boles, 2004p.567). Franklin D Roosevelt died in office in 1945 and Vice President Democrat HarryRead MoreThe Legacy Of The New Deal765 Words   |  4 Pagesadministrations before Kennedy did not make Civil Rights a priority, but there were decisions made to set the foundation for legislation down the road. In short it was an issue that got kicked down the road for someone else to take care of, sort of like what has happened with immigration reform. Starting with FDR (Franklin Delano Roosevelt), his focus was not as much Civil Rights as it was trying to assist those financially struggling. This was evident with FDR’s New D eal and the subsequent programs derivedRead MoreEssay on Ida B. Wells and Mary Mcleoud Bethune1628 Words   |  7 PagesThe history of The Black Civil Rights Movement in the United States is a fascinating account of a group of human beings, forcibly taken from their homeland, brought to a strange new continent, and forced to endure countless inhuman atrocities. Forced into a life of involuntary servitude to white slave owners, African Americans were to face an uphill battle for many years to come. Who would face that battle? To say the fight for black civil rights was a grassroots movement of ordinary people whoRead MoreEffects Of The New Deal Coalition855 Words   |  4 PagesThe new deal coalition was the coming up of voting blocks and interest groups such as, blacks, southern democrats and the urban Catholics. It involved a group of government programs which aimed to improve conditions for people who were suffering from depression. Many people were against the coalition becaus e they thought it built up the power held by the government hence promoting capitalism. In opening the method for the new deal coalition, President Herbert Hoover was overpowered by Franklin RooseveltRead MoreCivil Rights Vs. Civil Liberties901 Words   |  4 PagesSeptember 2017 Civil Rights vs. Civil Liberties In America, today there is a lot of controversy over human’s rights. This is not true of just today, however, this fight for people s rights has been going on for ages. There are two basic types of rights. 2 There are Civil Rights and there are Civil Liberties. Civil Liberties are a broader topic, such as the right to vote or the right to bear arms, they can be directly from the Bill of Rights or the Constitution. While Civil Rights are more specificRead MoreThe Civil Rights Movement By Charles W. Eagles780 Words   |  4 Pages Ten years after Fairclough article, another author continues the discussion of historians and their attempt to analysis the civil rights movement. Charles W. Eagles’ article â€Å"Toward New Histories of the Civil Rights Era† provides further supporting evidence that scholars fail to analyze the movement to its fullest potential. Eagles utilizes diplomatic historian John Lewis Gaddis analogy of historians s tudying the cold car. According to Gaddis, cold war scholars â€Å"reflected the contemporaneousRead MoreBiography: Anna Eleanor Roosevelt1465 Words   |  6 Pagescommonly known as Eleanor Roosevelt, enjoys a lasting place in both American and international history due to her exceptional pursuit for greater world peace and social justice. Eleanors encouragement for the human rights of all human beings, her durable contributions to both the civil rights and womens movements and her extensive journeys to the farthest places on the planet has earned her the pet name First Woman of the World. Eleanor Roosevelt, daughter of Elliott Roosevelt, is renowned as anRead MoreThe Impact Of The New Deal928 Words   |  4 PagesBlack political sentiment started to shift toward the democratic party with the Presidential campaign of New York Governor Al Smith for the 1928 election. Al Smith captured 17 percent of the black precincts of Philadelphia, 27 percent of the Black precincts of Cleveland and Chicago, and 28 percent of Harlem. These statistics showed a shift in support to the Democratic party previously unseen in American History. Full black voter shift did not occur with Al Smith’s Democratic Party. Al Smith wantedRead MoreThe Cold War Between Communism And Communism1382 Words   |  6 Pagesequality, civil rights, and the freedom to the world, and hoped to build an easier world for democracy and capitalism. However, Soviet Union, which was the only power that could rival the United States, claimed that communism could make the world more organized and ordered. Both countries hoped to expend their influences around the world, and their confliction generally turned to be a cold war, in other words, a battle between Capitalism and Communism. The cold war coincided with the civil rights movement

Partnership Business and Creditors †Free Samples to Students

Question: Discuss about the Partnership Business and Creditors. Answer: Introduction: After going through the facts that are present in this version, the issue arises if Friendly Bank can recover the loan taken by Busy Bee Florist Shop. This issue arises due to the fact if Violet and Sonny can be treated as the partners of the business. Therefore, in order to decide the present issue, it has to be considered if Violet and Sonny can be treated as the partners of the business. According to section 1 of the Partnership Act, (Vic), it has been stated that the presence of three elements is necessary in order to describe a particular relationship as a partnership. Therefore in such cases, it needs to be seen if the parties have been carrying on a business; in common; and for the purpose of making a profit. Therefore, if in case of a particular relationship, even a single element does not exist, such relationship cannot be termed as a partnership. In order to decide the meaning of 'carrying on business', it has to be seen if the parties have to establish some type of repetitiveness of action or if even a single action by the parties sufficient. There have been several decisions delivered by the courts in which the courts have maintained that a repetition of action or a continuity of action is required. Therefore, for example, in Smith v Anderson, 1880, there was a group of depositors. They have subscribed to purchase the shares by forming a trust. These shares were sold to the investors by the trustees. They also gave them the certificates. The issue that was present in this case was if this particular test can be described as a partnership. In order to deal with this issue, the court had to decide the nature of business as well as the relationship that existed between the parties involved in the trust. It was noted by the court that the trustees lacked the authority to speculate. Similarly, the trustees were not having mutual rights and obligations. After going through all these facts, and also looking at the nature of the trust, the court concluded that the trust was not a partnership. The reason was that there was no association among the persons to "carry on business". Under the relevant provision has been mentioned by section 2 of the Partnership Act. This provision contains the rules that can be applied for the purpose of deciding if the relationship between the parties can be treated as a partnership. But at the same time, it also needs to be mentioned that the decision regarding the presence of a partnership cannot be made only on the basis of these rules. Therefore, these rules are not the only determinants regarding the existence of a partnership. Therefore, the court asked to look at all the circumstances related with the agreement. For this purpose, the court has discovered the real substance of the agreement. That is present between the parties. Similarly it is also required to consider the express and implied intention of the parties for this purpose. In Wiltshire v Kuenzli, 1945, it was mentioned by Roper J. After the discovered that the parties have the intention of doing everything that makes them partners under law, the intention decl ared by the parties that they should not be considered as partners, was not valid. Stekel v Ellice (1973) is the other case that can be mentioned in this regard. In this case, the defendant had given employment to the plaintiff in his accounting firm. According to the agreement created between them. In 1968, it was provided that the plaintiff had become a salaried partner and a salary will be given to him. At the same time it was also mentioned in this agreement that in April 1969, the parties will enter into another agreement. It would be provided in this agreement that the plaintiff will become a full partner. The agreement provided that the term of employment was still at the 1969. The defendant was made liable for the losses, if any, of the business. But the parties never entered into any of the event and they continue to operate as before. There was a breakdown of relations between the parties in August 1970. As a result, the petition under the business and he also took his clients. At the same time, the plaintiff wanted a declaration from the court that the p artnership had come to an end and it should be ordered to be wound up. The decision of the court in this case was that a partnership was present between the parties and it continued even in the lack of an explicit agreement (Exparte Coral Investments Pty Ltd., 1979). Section 2(3), Partnership Act is also relevant provision in this regard. This provision mentions that when a person receives a share in the profits of the business, it has to be considered as prima facie evidence regarding the fact that that person is a partner. But receiving a share of the profits of the business or receiving a payment that is based on the profit made by the business does not in itself establishes that the person is a partner. However, the difficulty may arise due to the term 'prima facie' qualifying the term evidence. Hence, it can be said that the presence of a profit-sharing scheme can be treated as evidence in favor of the presence of a partnership but only on the basis of this fact, it cannot be concluded that a person is a partner. A significant case related with this issue is Cox v Hickman (1880). The brief facts of this case are that B and J Smith have been taking as partners. The company started to face financial difficulties. Under these circumstances, the Smiths entered into a deed of arrangement with its creditors. According to the provisions of the deed, the partnership business and its property were assigned to the creditors. The deed also provided that the creditors may continue the business under a new name. It also provided that the income generated by the business will be divided by all the creditors. Similarly, the deed also mentioned that after the loan has been repaid in full, the business will be returned to the Smiths. To creditors, Cox and Wheatcroft were appointed as the trustees for the business. While Cox never acted as a trustee, Wheatcroft was selected in this position only for some time. After Wheatcroft ceased to be a trustee, certain debts were incurred by the other trustees to Hickman. Some bills of exchange were also drawn. Under these circumstances, Hickman wanted that Cox and Wheatcroft should be responsible for the bills. But the court arrived at the conclusion that both of them were never mentioned as part ners. In the same way, there was no knowledge on the part of Hickman regarding the deed. As a result, Cox and Wheatcroft were allowed by the court to deny their liability although they received a share out of the profits made by the business. In this regard, the court expressed the opinion that only this fact was not sufficient to consider them partners. The court noted that the arrangement which provided that the profits made by the business were going to be used for paying the old debts and the creditors were ready to give up their right to be paid out of the capital, cannot be said to be amounting to a partnership to that third parties who do not know regarding the deed. Therefore the position appears to be that even if the person sharing the net profits of the business can be considered as a partner but this does not apply in all the cases. In this regard, it has to be seen in what sense the term has been used. For example in the present case, the court expressed its doubts, if the creditors, who were going to receive only the payments off their debt by being paid exactly the amount of the debt from the profit made by the business, can be treated as 'sharing the profits'. According to the deed present in this case, the property belonging to the business was assigned to the trustees. In order to carry out the business, and also to divide the profit made by the business among all the creditors and not only between the creditors who were a party to the deed, until the debt was paid. Therefore, in the opinion of the Court, this cannot be stated and as a result, they were not treated as partners. Keeping in view the opinion of the Court mentioned above, it can be considered as a general rule. However, the five cases where this results in cannot be made, has been mentioned in section 2(3) (a) to (e). In this regard, it has been mentioned by the law that the receipt of debt at the liquidated demand made by a person out of the profits of the business does not in itself makes such a person as a partner. The origin of this rule can be traced to Cox v Hickman (1860). But at the same time, the law also provides that in case circumstances exist, which revealed that the relationship was a partnership in reality, the lender can be considered as a partner regardless of the intention stated by the parties (Re Ruddock, 1879). In this case, money was given to the borrower by the lender was also the plaintiff. According to the agreement, the lender was going to receive interest as well as a share from the profit made by the business. The borrower had also agreed that the loan money was going to be used for the works related with the business. In the same way, the lender has also been given a ride to enter the property, if the borrower becomes bankrupt. While delivering its decision, the Court of Appeal had mentioned the need for finding out the 'real agreement' that was created by the parties. In this regard, the court stated that only the fact of sharing the profit of the business is not sufficient for the purpose of claiming a partnership. The court also stated that in the present case, the formal document signed by the parties reveals the real truth. Hence the court concluded that it was alone upon security. The lender was not going to be responsible for the loss, if any. As a result of the legal rules mentioned above, related with the law partnership, in the present is also it can be concluded that Violet needs to be treated as a partner in the Busy Bee Florist Shop even if the agreement between the parties clearly mentions that the lender (Violet) should not be considered as a partner. On the other hand, the conclusion is different, in case of Sonny. He cannot be treated as a partner in the business. This conclusion has been made on the basis of the reason that the law partnership provides that although a person may be receiving a share from the profits made by the business and this fact is prima facie evidence regarding the presence of a partnership but it cannot be concluded only on the basis of this fact that a particular person is a partner (Badeley v Consolidated Bank, 1888). According to the law partnership, in such cases, the contract for remuneration given to a servant or an agent as a share out of the profits made by the business does not i n itself make a person partner and therefore liable for its debts. References Badeley v Consolidated Bank (1888) 38 Ch D 238 Canny Gabriel Castle Advertising Pty Ltd Anor v Volume Sales (Finance) Pty Ltd (1974) 131 CLR 321 Cox v Hickman (1880) 8 HL Cas 268 Exparte Coral Investments Pty Ltd [1979] Qd R 292 Re Ruddock (1879) 5 VLR 51 (IP M) 51 Smith v Anderson (1880) 15 Ch D 247 Stekel v Ellice [1973] 1 WLR 191 Television Broadcasters Ltd v Ashtons Nominees Pty Ltd (No 1) (1979) 22 SASR 552 Wiltshire v Kuenzli (1945) 63 WN 47